A Discussion Re-Articulated.
Okay, now we're all tired sick of the "Using your Talents" discussion. However, in a moment of clear-headedness this morning, I suddenly realized what I didn't like about the typical perspective I get in Reformed circles:
Typical Reformed assertion: God gave us talents and the mandate to use them.
That's correct, right?
Okay. Let's talk about the word USE. Does this mean
To Pursue, or does it mean To Implement?
Here I beg to make a distinction.
Pursuance and Implementation are two very different things. For instance:
~I implement my love and expertise of advanced algebra by teaching my 10-yr-old sister math tricks to help her through long division.
~I pursue my expertise in algebra by....(list the ways)
See the difference? Implementation involves using something I ALREADY have and spreading it around. Multiplying a gift. Pursuance has an END in mind: algebra is the END, or a very closely linked relative of an END.
Defining Multiply: NOT ADDITION. Not stuffing yourself to capacity with understanding, but rather, bringing about exponential growth: you enjoy something, so you pass it on to those around you (in one way or another), and everyone enjoys God more because of it.
Talents are given, not gotten. What one WILL get or WANTS to get is not talent. What one HAS at the moment is talent. Therefore, the obligation is not to get MORE talent, but to USE what we already HAVE.
So, I therefore have no obligation to pursue music, or science, or Latin, or whatever (fill in the blank) to a path of worldly excellence. I have an obligation to do what I can in a way that glorifies God (loves one another and worships the Creator). So, mediocrity isn't Un-Christian. Laziness is Un-Christian. A Christian is not given the mandate to be GREAT, but rather to be USEFUL, HELPFUL, and ENCOURAGING.
Does God want second-hand glory? If I get it first, is it really His?
That's a slanderous question because it's not worded right and I'm not sure of the answer.
However, it is now time for me to get off the computer. See ya later.
Typical Reformed assertion: God gave us talents and the mandate to use them.
That's correct, right?
Okay. Let's talk about the word USE. Does this mean
To Pursue, or does it mean To Implement?
Here I beg to make a distinction.
Pursuance and Implementation are two very different things. For instance:
~I implement my love and expertise of advanced algebra by teaching my 10-yr-old sister math tricks to help her through long division.
~I pursue my expertise in algebra by....(list the ways)
See the difference? Implementation involves using something I ALREADY have and spreading it around. Multiplying a gift. Pursuance has an END in mind: algebra is the END, or a very closely linked relative of an END.
Defining Multiply: NOT ADDITION. Not stuffing yourself to capacity with understanding, but rather, bringing about exponential growth: you enjoy something, so you pass it on to those around you (in one way or another), and everyone enjoys God more because of it.
Talents are given, not gotten. What one WILL get or WANTS to get is not talent. What one HAS at the moment is talent. Therefore, the obligation is not to get MORE talent, but to USE what we already HAVE.
So, I therefore have no obligation to pursue music, or science, or Latin, or whatever (fill in the blank) to a path of worldly excellence. I have an obligation to do what I can in a way that glorifies God (loves one another and worships the Creator). So, mediocrity isn't Un-Christian. Laziness is Un-Christian. A Christian is not given the mandate to be GREAT, but rather to be USEFUL, HELPFUL, and ENCOURAGING.
Does God want second-hand glory? If I get it first, is it really His?
That's a slanderous question because it's not worded right and I'm not sure of the answer.
However, it is now time for me to get off the computer. See ya later.




