Well, I've been neglecting this place a bit more than usual. This post does not reflect the fact that anything I have to say, particularly. It merely reflects my sense of obligation to say *SOMETHING* every now and then.
Rhetoric assignments. Mine are all so awful I'm not posting any yet. So... Ha.
(you all didn't want them anyway.)
A classic brain-free moment:
Papa, while leading a Bible study discussion on the Sacraments: "[Annie], can you define
Ex opera operata for us?"
Me: "Well.. um.. Literally? it means...
Operated out of the operation. Or maybe
operation out of the operated. I'm not sure which. "
(*laughter from the masses*)
Sacred Latin is like that. Ambiguous, nary a verb in sight. Lots of implied words.
If one should translate
Ex opera operata into good English, he would say:
Through the (physical) operation, (the thing is) operated. And there's no good word I can think of to replace "operate." Sad, no?
I baked this marvelous pound cake yesterday morning.
Because I very slightly altered the recipe, it is now officially Mine, right? : D
Don't worry. It wasn't weird, didn't taste funny... or any of those lovely words typically attributed to my "slightly altered" recipes.
Now I shall translate the recipe into plain Cooking English for you all. It goes like this:
~set out 3 1/2 sticks of butter to soften.~and also 6 eggs, so they can warm to room temperature.~don't preheat the oven.~butter and flour three loaf pans.Cream together:~3 1/2 sticks of butter~2 c. sugarBeat in the eggs WELL. One at a time.While stirring continuously, gradually add:3 c. flour.Beat on HIGH for two minutes.Stir in 1 T each:vanilla extractalmond extract or lemon juice.Pour into pans, set in the cold oven. Heat oven to 300 F, and set timer for an hour and a half. Cool on racks.Consume, but get some help!As I (minimally) prepared for yet another standardized test this week, it occurred to me.
The PSAT is supposed to measure potential intelligence.
Yet, they only ask you to define five random words, all of them excessively bizarre. If you don't know the right five words...
Or. They give you a math problem that takes you a half-minute more than you're allowed to have. If you run out of time....
Or, they ask ambiguous questions in the comparative reading section. If you think too hard...
If you commit such errors while taking this test, your scores will still go to the state school boards. And they will know (for sure!) that you aren't as smart as the next guy.
(I already like the sound of this... !_!)
And so, this is really a matter of Providence. I must add that the (mostly) tender treatment shown toward me by standardized tests in the past is completely unwarranted and undeserved. Because I'm not that functional in real life. :-P
Anna and I went over to Kyong's office this afternoon and she notarized our identification papers. A blonde student stood in the door, grinning as she waited in line, while we bantered on about step-dancing (and why we couldn't
possibly give her a demonstration....) ... It took awhile longer because part of our ID wasn't there when it should have been. Kyong had to write it all in for us. . .
We wrap things up, and she says:
"Well, now you can take your test, but you haven't passed your dance test yet."
Oh, bother.
So today in Irish dance class we did all sorts of things, and none of them well. Mrs. Hill took us over the same old jig step, cleaning up our form and teaching us a couple variations. Then we did the four-hand square, with the lead-around and the stars.
And the little class does
Waves of Tory remarkably well. I volunteered as an "extra," to round out the odd number of kids. They do the waves very well, but their lines are CROOKED.
Just because they
want to pull and run and jostle.
They learn.
Have I said enough yet?
Woman in White remains a predictable puzzlement. Puzzlement, because parts of the plot haven't been explained, and if they have, the explanation has been extremely dull, because I missed it. What was that
Secret of Sir Percival's that Anne Catherick mentioned? Surely it was more than just his dire financial straits... And why did she remain imprisoned in his asylum when she didn't really seem insane?
But aside from those two questions, the book remains as predictable as ever. I hope that changes soon. Indeed, it had better, for the I've reached third epoch...
Why am I still reading that old book anyway? Well, that's my Fun Book. Neurodevelopment and psychology don't count. Sorry.
I continue to test Babinski reflexes, as a sort of passive hobby. My enlisted test group is proving a motley lot.
I now wonder if "abnormal" is really so abnormal after all.
And I'd love a book on human reflexes, if anyone knows where to find one. The OSU library doesn't seem to have anything, but perhaps I haven't looked far enough. : P